Friday 17 June 2011

My Personal Poetic

My own particular Poetic: what is it? It is only in the last few months that I have even considered this question. And it’s not worth bothering with Wikipedia – it told me nothing! If I have understood correctly my personal Poetic is my literary or artistic voice, and perhaps touches on influences, experiences and what inspires me or has inspired me to write or create. In order to answer this question I shall touch on these and other factors, and hopefully provide a clear picture of my own literary microcosm, a coherent idea of the literary and artistic macrocosm and perhaps even how the two relate.

First of all, where does my creativity come from? I guess it comes from my soul; whether inspiration comes from God is hard to say – some of the ideas I’ve had it would be blasphemy to attribute to the Almighty, though He does have an uncanny knack of turning negatives into positives and He does move in mysterious ways. And as you probably deduced from my last comments, my soul is informed by religious beliefs of a discernibly Christian nature, and yet I would be lying if I said sex held no fascination for me either – I realise it makes for an interesting contrast! All my life I have been fascinated by both the sacred and the profane, but never the twain should meet. Of course, these don’t always feature in my work, at least as far as I’m aware, though no doubt a moralistic viewpoint would possibly be discernable, plus my fixation on the theme of redemption, and perhaps explorations of what it is to be a man. I am not sure I could write a purely dark piece, or a totally dark piece – I guess I am too fixated on heading for the light, and that would inevitably shine through. However, I have also written a few pieces light-hearted and comical in nature, if a little quirky. I guess this is indicative of my generally happy-go-lucky disposition.

I guess as first adolescence and then adulthood took over I may have inadvertently picked up an existentialist thread in my poetic. I was a straight white Christian male growing up in a middle-class household in a rural/regional conservative heartland, so what oppression could I have possibly faced? The answer: being a straight white Christian male growing up in a middle-class household in a rural/regional conservative heartland in the ‘90s! Certain elements of society seemed determined to make me feel guilty for being a straight white male, at least from where I was standing, and straight white male bashing seemed to be the sport du jour among the left-wing elite. Furthermore I just couldn’t get into the popular music of the day, be it the depressing, joyless proto-emo dirges of The Smashing Pumpkins and their ilk or the egotistical and at times sociopathic and misogynistic posturing of rap or the soulless electronic noise of techno or a lot of the bubblegum that was on the charts, and as I’ve gotten older television and pop music has gotten worse – vacuousness, cheapened sexuality and prime-time pornography, self-absorption, materialism and commercialism and all too often a moral compass that is either skew-whiff or non-existent. I found myself drawn to country music, jazz, and classic rock from the ‘50s and ‘60s. Because of my love of the classics and lukewarm to cold response to a lot of the newer material some of my peers harboured the attitude that I was a walking anachronism, born out of my era. “Do you listen to any modern music?” they would ask, to which I reply that I do, just not the teenybopper stuff. Then more recently I was stuck in a job I hated which drained me physically and mentally, which gave me no joy or stimulation, until enrolling in this course and finally breaking free of that treadmill. I now watch little television and listen to no commercial radio, choosing not to let advertising, abysmal pop music and general stupidity be shoved down my throat. More importantly, I feel I have broken free of the “Other” and am taking charge of my life.

However, somewhere between childhood and adulthood I swung from being a budding Romantic to more of a Realist persuasion; could I be currently swinging somewhere between the two? As a youth, just as the Romantics of old idealised medieval Europe I found myself drawn to mid-20th century America, and also Britain and Australia, taking perhaps a Romantic view of it, though I can’t help but notice a palaeo-conservative element to Romanticism – both schools of thought idealise the past, or at least perceive the past as better than the present. Indeed they seemed to be well-reconciled in me. Even in Realist mode, the attraction to that time and place still remains, perhaps not least because it gave us classic hard-boiled crime novels and film noir and the early music of artists like Johnny Cash – tales of the downtrodden and disenfranchised, of desperate losers and cynical heroes and anti-heroes often on the wrong side of the tracks.

Writers – be they novelists, poets and even songwriters/musicians – who have influenced me have included Fyodor Dostoevsky, Joseph Conrad, James Ellroy, Frank Miller, John O’Grady (a.k.a. Nino Culotta), T.S. Eliot, John Lennon, Johnny Cash and Hank Williams. For some reason I’ve often felt like I subconsciously emulate O’Grady, though I like to think my literary voice is my own.

My motivation for writing stemmed from a love of stories, be they in books, movies or songs, or whatever, together with a fertile imagination and a desire to create stories of my own. That plus at least while going through life at the time I found my everyday life as a white middle-class country kid bit nondescript at times, a bit mundane, so it provided a little escape too, a little magic. Plus there have simply been times where it’s in me and it’s got to come out. And indeed it has always been cathartic. With each story or poem I wrote, with each book I read and each class I took my technique got better. I also broadened and developed my vocabulary to lend richness and diversity to the language used, to have the right words to convey the message or paint the mental picture and it also comes in handy for poetry and alliteration, a literary device I am particularly partial to and welcome every opportunity to employ.

My poetry has tended to be free verse, sometimes almost prosaic. This is partly through laziness, as it can be hard to come up with a rhyme that doesn’t sound trite or corny, and I lack the ability to compose music so what need have I for the iambic pentameter?

My actual purpose for writing, well, again I like stories, though I’d like to think there’s at least some depth to what I write too, that they edify or at least entertain. Naturally I would like it to be read by others, I would like it to reach others and enrich them somehow – if I just wrote and didn’t do anything with what I had written it would amount to nothing more than artistic masturbation.

But then I suppose that’s been the case with many a writer or artist across the ages – they’re creating this possibly great work, something beautiful, so why not share it? And if they can do it professionally, even better. But what is the role in society of the writer, or indeed the artist or musician? Is it to make a social comment, to hold a mirror up to society? Is it to make a political statement? Is it to fight oppression, or alternatively to reinforce it? Does it create social change, or merely chronicle it? Is it to praise or commune with God, or thumb one’s nose at Him or disregard Him altogether? Is it to make an artistic statement? Is it to make a statement of any kind, or is it merely to entertain? In the case of writing, is it simply to record and provide information? Is it to escape one’s milieu, or confront it head on? Depending on the individual work any one of these answers is correct, and sometimes there is more than one correct answer.

I would like to think the average reader could be anyone, that I could have a broad and diverse readership. I seek to entertain and hopefully edify too, to hopefully make the reader think, to uplift the reader and perhaps even provide a moral compass. One faculty I’ve always wanted to engage in the audience is their imagination, to take the pictures in my head and put them in the heads of my audience.

Thursday 9 June 2011

Rough synopsis/idea for a novel

A few weekends ago I sat down and jotted out a rough synopsis for a novel I feel the urge to write.  This may be a little long, so hats off to those of you who read to the end.



The setting is primarily Memphis, Tennessee, USA between the years 1929-1934, though there will most likely be some action in other locales including Chicago.  Our hero is Henry "Hank" Strickland, a young agent with the Department of Investigation (now the FBI), who gets transferred from Chicago to the Prohibition Bureau in Memphis in his home state.  He wants to take down Capone and his ilk in the wake of the Valentine's Day Massacre, and it is decided it is safer for him to stop bootleggers and thus help cut off Capone's supply/source of income.  With him is his wife Dorothy, a native of Illinois who he met in Chicago.

Not long after they arrive in Memphis Hank meets our heroine Lucy Beaufort, a free-spirited young woman who owns and runs a theatre willed to her by her grandfather.  Each is intrigued by the other and before too long they realise they are in love, something Hank struggles with due to being married.  They eventually succumb to temptation, and when they realise what they have done they are both racked with guilt so decide to break the affair off.  The guilt is further compounded for Hank when his wife is fatally injured in a car accident, even though Lucy tries to save her life.  Dorothy, knowing or suspecting feelings between the two of them, asks that Lucy take care of Hank and forgives them as she dies.  Lucy offers herself to him, offers to be there for him, and he says he'll come around eventually, but for the time being he needs to mourn.  Hank blames himself and becomes depressed and even a little self-destructive, though still functioning at his job.  He eventually gets transferred back to the Bureau of Investigation.

Enter a third character, Aaron Craven, a banker, who comes to town having had to flee Birmingham, Alabama after being caught out embezzling his employers.  Hank meets him and manages to aid in his arrest (a possible catalyst being Aaron's attempt to bribe him).  Hank and Lucy meet again at the trial, and from there their affair starts anew.  Meanwhile, Aaron goes to the Alabama State Pen where he falls in with a cadre of criminals, with whom he escapes during the prison fire on November 28, 1932 (one of the crims sets the fire, only intending to create a distraction, but most of the prison is destroyed, providing the perfect distraction).  They set off robbing a few places, including banks, going from state to state.  They want to join up with the Barker-Karpis gang but get turned down.  Between jobs the gang and their women hide out in St. Paul, Minnesota and then Hot Springs, Arkansas.

The Kansas City Massacre on June 17, 1933 sparks the U.S. Government's "War on Crime".  Hank practices his firearm techniques and petitions Hoover to allow heavier firepower for agents and adequate training in their use.  He is consigned to mostly office work as usual, and is passed up for the Flying Squad (or Dillinger Squad).  However, he is one of the agents who assist in the arrest of Machine Gun Kelly.  He also ends up catching the girlfriends and wives of Aaron and his gang, and holds his own both in interviewing and in armed confrontations.

Between the changing nature of his job and his relationship with Lucy we see Hank go from quiet, somewhat repressed desk jockey to crime-fighting hero.  Conversely, Lucy proves to not be a femme fatale at all, quite the opposite she's a decent person and though she and Hank do the wrong thing initially she is determined to atone and ultimately helps redeem Hank.  What I'm especially interested in also is not punishment so much as redemption, at least for Hank and Lucy.  I also want to make comment and criticism of the Prohibition (which will still be relevant today, given certain elements taking a hardline anti-alcohol stance) and of consumerism and materialism, relevant both in the 1920s and today.  Granted the tale will have some romance elements but also with Hank as something of a noir hero, and I also like the idea of Hank and Lucy as existentialists.

Hank is a nice bloke, intelligent, conscientious, conservative and even somewhat repressed, an eccentric but fun-loving side in him is repressed.  He's tall, slim and bespectacled, and depending on one's perspective is either handsome and scholarly or lanky and nerdish.  He and his wife love each other, even if Dorothy doesn't entirely understand him and even treats him as quaint, even nerdish.  He is a member of a prestigious lawyer family and is fully qualified himself, though his Dad got him a job with the Justice Bureau because he was just too honest to be a lawyer and join the family business.  He wanted to be a Texas Ranger as a kid like a favourite uncle of his was, but his overprotective father talked him out of it.  He is bored by the bourgeois lifestyle, and despises materialism but is putting up with it because it's what he's supposed to do.

Lucy Beaufort is slim, blonde and gorgeous, a lady but a free spirit and very independent too, dressing like a flapper to screen the true gentlemen from the riff-raff.  She is single when we meet her, having been cheated on and dumped by her erstwhile man.  She is kind and generous and compassionate, she is also eccentric, fun-loving and free-spirited, is very much a '20s woman when we meet her, and unlike others she encourages him to think different, be himself, be his own man, take more of an interest in the arts and such and he's right, the bourgeois lifestyle is bullshit.  She engages and stimulates him intellectually too.  She vibes sensuality, non-conformity, but not malevolence.  In her Hank finds a kindred spirit.


Of course, there may well be some small deviations between the initial plan and the final product - I guess it all depends on where it takes me - but the above is what I'm aiming for so far and the direction I feel I'm being led.  Now to get it underway...

Tuesday 7 June 2011

Introductory Post

Hello everyone, how are you all?  Hale and hearty I hope.

As the byline says, I have opened this journal for the purposes of musings, discussion and even projects of a literary nature.  Acting upon the advice of more literary-minded friends I have finally opened an account on Blogspot/Blogger.as it may get me the networking and exposure I need on this journey.

All my life I have wanted to be a writer, though I haven't travelled the simplest route to get here.  It tended to be more of a hobby than anything, though an ill-advised Accountancy course and a few years in an abbattoirs got in the way.  Now I have more leeway to pursue my passion so may the Muses not turn their faces from me now.

I also have two blogs at LiveJournal, The Jester and The Jester's Literary Journal, if you fancy a look.  I may even cross-post entries from time to time.

I've just opened this blog so it may be a little rough around the edges to begin with but I will fine-tune it.  I look forward to communicating with fellow bloggers, writers and people in the industry, making friends and contacts.  And again, may the creative juices keep flowing.

If you'll excuse the cliche, watch this space.